Nicolas Jarry vs Andrea Pellegrino Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In recent months, Pellegrino has secured 44.68% of points on his second serve, while Jarry excels slightly, achieving 53.42%. This difference is significant as second serve performance is closely linked to predicting match outcomes. Furthermore, in matters of returning opponent’s second serves, Jarry has a slight edge with a success rate of 44.21% compared to Pellegrino’s 41.36%.

The performance on first serve returns favors Pellegrino, who manages 31.2%, while Jarry trails with 23.12%. First serve return effectiveness is crucial in distinguishing who bears the advantage in head-to-head contests. Under pressure, Jarry shows stronger resilience by saving 64.1% of breakpoints, whereas Pellegrino saves 52.04%, indicating Jarry’s superior composure in critical match moments.

Analyzing their overall yearly performance, Pellegrino has a notable advantage with a win rate of 55.56% (W/L 35/28), contrasting with Jarry's 38.89% (W/L 14/22). This comprehensive review provides a clear insight into their capabilities over time. Playing surfaces also play a vital role; Pellegrino demonstrates competence on clay with a 56% win rate (W/L 253/201), whereas grass proves challenging with a mere 20% (W/L 1/4). Similarly, Jarry’s prowess on clay is reflected in a 64% win rate (W/L 300/167), contrasted with a 34% (W/L 11/21) on indoor hard courts.

At a competitive level, Pellegrino has predominantly played at the Challengers/ITF level, boasting a win rate of 58.93% (W/L 33/23). In comparison, Jarry has engaged mainly on the Main tour, securing only 33.33% victories (W/L 5/10), emphasizing the different environments in which they thrive. The caliber of their opponents also varies; Pellegrino battles against those with an average rank of 252.33, while Jarry competes with players ranked on average 101, indicating Jarry's exposure to tougher competition.

In terms of breakpoint conversion, Pellegrino surpasses Jarry, converting 34.35% of opportunities into breaks, compared to Jarry’s 25.33%. This factor often proves instrumental in predicting match dynamics and outcomes. Should the encounter edge into a deciding set, Pellegrino’s form is formidable, having won 74% of such sets recently, starkly outperforming Jarry’s 47% win rate in decisive situations. As events get underway, ongoing performance metrics may influence predictions, but based strictly on these comparisons, Pellegrino seems to possess the statistical upper hand heading into the match.